Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis
Tony Szamboti Wrote:Their problem is that a focused jet cannot be produced by a large falling mass. The pressure produced there would be widespread and unfocused.




That simply isn't true. The floor itself is a pad of corrugated steel used as a pouring platform onto which reinforced concrete is poured. When the mass of the falling section above started the floor collapse (ROOSD) this floor area served as a pump of sorts compressing downward and forcing the air outward laterally. You are seeing it happen right in front of you with the dust jets. The shape of the tower was a focused jet producer because of this set-up. It was a downward gun barrel with a core in the center. If you had better engineering understanding you would realize the path of least resistance vertically was the unsupported floor pads. Both the core and outer perimeter frames offered vertical static resistance. No such resistance existed under the floor pads which were suspended and not supported by columns. So science is telling you the downward force would seek the path of least resistance causing the floor pads to shoot down the shaft. The mass falling through that void would be a pile of material on the top side with the individual floor pad face on the bottom. As this plunging mass encountered each floor it would create an enormous rammed pneumatic compressed air blast seeking escape out the sides where there was least resistance. You cannot answer this obvious situation by repeating mantras over and over that the overpressure there would be widespread and unfocused. A person with a competent grasp of the mechanical engineering involved would automatically understand the shapes and forces described would automatically produce these results simply because it couldn't be any other way scientifically. Especially at the speed and intensity at which it occurred. The statement alone that "A focused jet cannot be produced by a falling mass" is so inherently ridiculous that it alone disqualifies the person who said it. There are centuries of engineering that rely on channeled forces creating focused jets.

What you had was a downward gun barrel effect where the lack of resistance of the floor pads in the unsupported area created an acceleration of the plunge in that area due to the greater resistance of the inner and outer frames causing the pneumatic overpressure to channel down the shaft. This ROOSD zone's susceptibility to air compression allowed a greater, quicker downward transfer of force creating a kinetic transfer of energy that ripped down the shaft slightly ahead of the speed of the falling mass of materials unzipping the inner core in the process. As odd as it is the flashover could have even served as a sort of piston explosion jump-starting the process.

Did I miss where you explained why there were no such dust jets at the alleged upper area around the 98th floor where you claim the initiating demolition charges occurred?


Messages In This Thread
Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis - by Albert Doyle - 11-08-2013, 08:23 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  WTC-7 Before Collapse - Video of activities inside and outside Peter Lemkin 0 4,991 04-12-2015, 09:45 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  New Detailed Analysis of WTC 7 Controlled Demolition Peter Lemkin 0 5,235 01-12-2015, 04:42 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  The case against the NIST WTC 7 collapse initiation analysis Tony Szamboti 4 4,047 04-11-2013, 07:11 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  New Analysis Summary Of 9-11-01 Insider Trading [with some very interesting facts, if true]! Peter Lemkin 4 5,553 28-10-2013, 03:01 PM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis: Redux Lauren Johnson 0 3,728 16-08-2013, 03:39 AM
Last Post: Lauren Johnson
  New Seismic Analysis Further Points to Controlled Demolition.... Peter Lemkin 0 3,720 03-12-2012, 05:21 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  911 Meta Analysis Jeffrey Orling 18 10,680 23-10-2012, 08:54 PM
Last Post: Albert Doyle
  STill the best and most comprehensive timeline and information source for 911-related events Peter Lemkin 0 2,697 10-08-2012, 08:10 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  New theory explains collapse of Twin Towers- Aluminium and water explosions Magda Hassan 7 9,256 27-09-2011, 05:47 PM
Last Post: Jeffrey Orling
  First Wikileaks Cable possibly related to 911, Al Quaeda, etc. Peter Lemkin 0 6,482 26-09-2011, 08:02 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)