Labels

[Albert Rossi]

The very first sentence is a perfect example of the framing we are talking about. This is it:"Sorry, conspiracy theorists, modern forensic science shows that John F. Kennedy was likely killed by "one guy with a grudge and a gun' said professor John McAdams during a panel for Nova's new Cold Case" JFK on Wednesday at the Television Critics Assn. press tour in Beverly Hills."

This is the other tactic. Take the wind out of the sails by claiming to have the kind of evidentiary support the critics usually muster against the official lie. Here, "modern forensic science". In the case of Mortal Error Redivivus, it's an examination of "all the declassified ARRB documents". Of course, it's insidious, but it's a well-known technique. It p's me off, but it is to be expected. The problem is the public has no way of knowing. Smoke in their eyes. And that's what they depend on. But how do you defeat that?