13-08-2013, 01:46 AM
Magda Hassan Wrote:I have studied this for a long time and your comparison regarding Jackie is not even in the same ballpark. We know based on the evidence Jackie had nothing to do with it, but we don't know that about the Masons. Look at how many were involved in the investigation and with the WC. I find it very interesting the way you folks seem reluctant to consider this. That is fine, but you shouldn't make blanket statements diregarding them.The JFK assassination ties into many bigger things and to act like this does not possibly include them is just wrong to me.Rob Caprio Wrote:Rob, some other people have done 'research' and decided the evidence shows it was Jacky Kennedy who shot and killed her husband. We don't have their 'research' here either. It most certainly is a coincidence that both JFK and Abif received wounds in similar places. It is also a coincidence that Aldous Huxley and C.S. Lewis died the same day. They weren't part of the plot either.Jan Klimkowski Wrote:Rob - it's simple.Professional snipers were not told to create pretty Masonic patterns in the corpse of JFK.They were tasked with killing a VIP target travelling in a moving car in a public place.Your Hiram Abif bullshit is a straw man, which delegitimises serious research into, for instance, possible involvement of SMOM elements in the Kennedy hit.First of all, It is not "my" research as you say but rather the work of others. All I was attempting to do was show the work others have done over the years. If you don't agree with it that is fine, but I find it to be dangerous for you and others to decide for other people what to believe by calling this garbage and other names. It most certainly could be a coincidence that both JFK and Abif suffered the same location wounds, but then again it may not be. Let's just leave it at that.