14-08-2013, 09:58 AM
Jeffrey Orling Wrote:I have to laugh..hahhahaWhat evidence does the CD explanation leave out?
Yes there appears to be what you refer to as a cover up... an official report about what was supposed to explain the collapse but we agree in this... that the report does not. It's hard to attribute this to honestly made mistakes or insufficient resources. One then might think that they intended to deceive or to use your word - cover up.
So let's accept that the official reports were a cover up.
Your position along with the CD people is that NIST found that the destruction did not have a so called natural cause... jets and destruction and heat weakening... but that the three towers were taken down with explosives and this *fact* could only mean that it was "insiders" behind the conspiracy and the entire official story and the technical reports were part of the conspiracy... commit the crime and cover the tracks. This is perfectly logical.
But there are other possible explanations to produce a cover up and they don't include CD or the inside job... but they do support a conspiracy after the fact. A conspiracy to hide wrong doing.
We've seen such behavior in the past... usually when there is some sort of industrial disaster.. Bhopal, BP Oil spill, Exxon Valdez, PCBs in the Hudson, Fukishima, Chernobyl, Three Mile Island... even Katrina. But the list is very long. What is the common element? A need to cover up malfeasance, criminal liability, protection of those who made bad decisions or who failed to act as they should have and failed to protect the people, workers, the environment and so forth. The big guys are protecting the powerful corporations and those who run them and drive their policies.
So there ARE other sorts of cover ups possible and I have proposed that we consider that the engineering design, the development process, the constuction oversight and approvals process may have been flawed to put it mildly. Millions if not billions were made in developing the WTC... These were state authorities which likely engaged in the usual waste fraud abuse... and add to that professional misconduct, incompetence, willful neglect of the publics' safetly and so forth. Lot's of inviduals should have had to answer for many decisions involved with the WTC development.
And of course the system... the old boys network... the so called blue line of silence is always in self protect mode when crisis presents. We see no individual accountability for any of the above and other disasters and at most a pathetically small and inadequate and poorly administered victims' compensation fund to slap a band aid on it and move forward with the same agenda... no lessons learned.
And of course, regardless of who was behind what was perceived and marketed as an attack... an act of war... with a patsy identified the people would get behind the primitive concept of vengeance and retribution and how convenient that it would be Arab terrorists and usher in a new never ending war and excuse for the militarism of the empire... to gobble up more of the world.
This sort of cover up does not fit so well with the deep state paradigm. But it is nevertheless a possible analysis and without indisputable hard evidence... confessions and so forth the insider job analysis is speculation. The technical discussion pivots on whether there were planted devices or not with the presumption that this would be the evidence for the inside job and deep state frame. That case has not been proven and jurors have not been convinced. There are some who claim CD did not happen with complete confidence. My position it could explain but the evidence of the devices and a detailed mechanism has not been demonstrated... it's an idea, a speculation and it conveniently leaves out evidence which does not support a CD conclusion. So ALL evidence must be accounted for in the correct technical explanation.
Cherry pickin' not allowed!