John Armstrong's Harvey and Lee

[Jan Klimkowski]

I don't think what I wrote either conflicts with what Jan writes or deserves the gross overreaction Jan commits.


I backed-off answering your Chapman reply at the time because I thought it wasn't worth it. However I believe it was based on putting words in my mouth and overblowing minor points. I believe Chapman was a CIA-programmed assassin. I don't see the giant offense Jan is trying to force through semantics and distortion of meanings. I'm perfectly capable of explaining my views on Chapman. I'm failing to see what offense Jan is showing here or how I've muddied the waters? My self-MKULTRA programming point was made hypothetically. I think Jan was so anxious to disagree with me that he failed to fathom the context. The context was besides CIA programming self-induced programming under LSD was the only other option. However my other clearly seen information shows that there was much evidence to show CIA manipulation. God, Jan, bash me over the head for making a simple hypothetical point!


I'd like to enter a protest of moderator abuse and a certain poster being allowed to re-appear and do the things he was moderated for.

Albert Doyle - your protest has been noted and will be discussed by the founders.

For the record, in my judgement, your arguments are tangled, convoluted and distract from the key issues.

The record also shows that I did not "put words in your mouth". Rather I tried to untangle your meaning, and having untangled it then exposed the problems with your hypothesis.

This is exactly what you, Albert Doyle, are attempting to do in your relentless questioning of Tony Szamboti in the 9/11 thread here.