19-08-2013, 07:11 PM
(This post was last modified: 19-08-2013, 08:15 PM by Keith Millea.)
From article link above:
R K Locke wrote:
R K,I'd like to understand if you think these assertions above are generally sound.I'm just trying to get a read on what your position is.
My own feelings are that they are not sound.In fact,I would think they are the opposite of soundness.
1-Psychedelics to debase the intellectual abilities of young people?
It's been my view that psychedelic substances ENHANCE intellectual abilities.
2-to make them as easy to control as the serfs of the Dark Ages.
It's been my view that psychedelics lead away from control and towards free thought.
3-One accurate term used for the individuals who were victims of this debasing was "Deadhead," which is an equivocation for a "dead mind" or "a drugged, thoughtless person."
As a proud Deadhead,it's my view that this quote is totally insulting.
Thoughts R K???
Quote:Most today assume that the CIA and the other intelligence-gathering organizations of the U.S. government are controlled by the democratic process. They therefore believe that MK-ULTRA's role in creating the psychedelic movement was accidental "blowback." Very few have even considered the possibility that the entire "counterculture" was social engineering planned to debase America's culture as the name implies. The authors believe, however, that there is compelling evidence that indicates that the psychedelic movement was deliberately created. The purpose of this plan was to establish a neo-feudalism by the debasing of the intellectual abilities of young people to make them as easy to control as the serfs of the Dark Ages. One accurate term used for the individuals who were victims of this debasing was "Deadhead," which is an equivocation for a "dead mind" or "a drugged, thoughtless person."
R K Locke wrote:
Quote:Whilst I don't necessarily subscribe to some of the more speculative assertions that the authors make, I do think that the general thrust of their argument is sound.
R K,I'd like to understand if you think these assertions above are generally sound.I'm just trying to get a read on what your position is.
My own feelings are that they are not sound.In fact,I would think they are the opposite of soundness.
1-Psychedelics to debase the intellectual abilities of young people?
It's been my view that psychedelic substances ENHANCE intellectual abilities.
2-to make them as easy to control as the serfs of the Dark Ages.
It's been my view that psychedelics lead away from control and towards free thought.
3-One accurate term used for the individuals who were victims of this debasing was "Deadhead," which is an equivocation for a "dead mind" or "a drugged, thoughtless person."
As a proud Deadhead,it's my view that this quote is totally insulting.
Thoughts R K???
"You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.â€
Buckminster Fuller
Buckminster Fuller