20-08-2013, 11:42 PM
And yet
a perennial denizen of the eponymous den
denying any assistance in the otherwise miraculous collapse
The official explanation
does not explain
only delay
Years pass, scores of pages, a torrent of words, a Niagara of diagrams, videos in onionskinned veils
and yet
"I shall not be moved"
To paraphrase Peter Dale Scott
whose most recent reasoned MOAB on Al Qaeda appears linked elsewhere in the Forum
events are made to happen to profit in oil, arms, drugs while appearing "natural"
Another commission, this one with its blockhead, know-nothings, naysayers and soothing anesthetists
assures us there was nothing untoward in the Towers' collapse
nothing to see here
and, we add, no point in looking
Why come over here where you're not interested, Jeffrey Orling,
only to plant yourself square in every discussion of the event
to say
"there is nothing to see
and, parenthetically,
I'm not looking"
Shall we have more years and torrents of Yesbut and Butwait
(hint: we never hear the end, do we)
A carhop at IHOP or just someone asleep in the doorway
over whom to step each day
The table reset:
The Towers did not fall from heat caused by planes' fires
They required explosive assistance
Toward which necessary explanation we shall proceed
assisted by the professional expertise of Tony Szamboli
despite the friction of Jeffrey "I am not a student of deep politics" Orling
Two wars, oil, poppies, arms, not to mention the astronomical profit from insurance on the terror acts
and the riptide of martial law lite, the strategic tension, the new terror model, oooh scary business that
A Commission which lied and continues to stonewall
A successful application of deep political analysis will explain: 1) Method of collapse; 2) Reason for operation.
a perennial denizen of the eponymous den
denying any assistance in the otherwise miraculous collapse
The official explanation
does not explain
only delay
Years pass, scores of pages, a torrent of words, a Niagara of diagrams, videos in onionskinned veils
and yet
"I shall not be moved"
To paraphrase Peter Dale Scott
whose most recent reasoned MOAB on Al Qaeda appears linked elsewhere in the Forum
events are made to happen to profit in oil, arms, drugs while appearing "natural"
Another commission, this one with its blockhead, know-nothings, naysayers and soothing anesthetists
assures us there was nothing untoward in the Towers' collapse
nothing to see here
and, we add, no point in looking
Why come over here where you're not interested, Jeffrey Orling,
only to plant yourself square in every discussion of the event
to say
"there is nothing to see
and, parenthetically,
I'm not looking"
Shall we have more years and torrents of Yesbut and Butwait
(hint: we never hear the end, do we)
A carhop at IHOP or just someone asleep in the doorway
over whom to step each day
The table reset:
The Towers did not fall from heat caused by planes' fires
They required explosive assistance
Toward which necessary explanation we shall proceed
assisted by the professional expertise of Tony Szamboli
despite the friction of Jeffrey "I am not a student of deep politics" Orling
Two wars, oil, poppies, arms, not to mention the astronomical profit from insurance on the terror acts
and the riptide of martial law lite, the strategic tension, the new terror model, oooh scary business that
A Commission which lied and continues to stonewall
A successful application of deep political analysis will explain: 1) Method of collapse; 2) Reason for operation.