Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis

[Tony Szamboti]

deeply flawed?

What are the flaws in my diagrams? I'd like to correct them...

You do realize that Tony's papers have been roundly criticized... or in the common parlance debunked by all sorts of physicists and engineers... I posted links... Did you find the critiques deeply flawed too? What were their flaws?

I am sure they would like to correct their mistakes as well.

We have no idea if the people on the JREF and 911 Forums actually are physicists and engineers like you want to say, as they are all anonymous. That means you can't know either. Regardless of what they are it is a joke that you would say they debunked my work and of course you provide no basis for that, just links to long winded nonsensical threads. No surprise there.

It is talk like this that truly exposes your bias Jeffrey and when you behave like that you become deserving of ridicule.

I have to agree about the JREF forums and much of the 911 forums. Very dodgy. So moving from the forums what about the academic journals?

Not one of the people Jeffrey seems to regard so highly has published anything anywhere except as an anonymous person on the Internet. Dodgy is an appropriate word for them and I regret to say for our friend Jeffrey also.