Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis

[Lauren Johnson]

IMO, many of you have fallen victim of a disinformation - distraction agent. You are playing his game here for 2.5 years - long before many of you even came to this forum. To my knowledge only one person on the planet will publicly acknowledge they 'buy into' his theory. He is spinning your wheels and wasting your time - trying to discredit you and your ideas...that is his purpose and perhaps his basis for a 'living'. J.O., what were your last commissions as an architect? - or are you now just an 'architect mirror of Colby from the EF? - and Sunsteinian cognitive dissonance agent?! This is all heat and NO light...as you can't get light when you don't have an honest opponent. I'll go on record as stating I do NOT believe even J.O. believes in his 'theory' [which defies the evidence, the laws of Physics, logic [both common and in his 'field', reason he was removed from A&E4911Truth, and can find no other suitable and welcoming forum but here. If we don't accept or long suffer those who believe LHO was the lone assassin; I believe we should not accept nor long suffer those who think 9-11 did not have at its core Controlled Demolition. Sue me for slander, I'd welcome it.

J.O. doesn't just post his lone idea of how the towers came down. Every other post of how they came down he interjects/contradicts/confounds/doubts/questions. This entity has an agenda that coincides, IMO, with the official version and the 'officials' behind the 'curtain' of power.

Peter, I have come to agree with you. In May of last year, I called out JO for being a disinfo and was smacked down by Jan Klimkowski for not appreciating JO's presence as he has shared his expertese with us. Since that time, I have worked at having to be convinced that his credentials do not reflect an honestly held position. This long thread with Tony Szamboti's contributions have finally convinced me (rationally) that JO could not possibly be competent and honest. He may be competent but he is not honest. But if he is honest, then he is not competent. Either way, he should be placed on moderation.

Secondly, he has behaved in such a way consistent with a Sunsteinian disinfo agent. He has convinced no one here, as far as I can tell. He certainly has disabused me of the notion that he has any credibility. As much as I admire and respect Magda, her view that JO is engaged as an honest partner in discussion as an equal to TZ is no longer possible to believe. But then, some people believe the sun goes around the earth. Sorry Magda, you and presumably other mods, have been taken in. JO's continued posting privileges at DPF should be seen as an embarrassment.