29-08-2013, 12:49 AM
David Healy Wrote:Tracy Riddle Wrote:Charles Drago Wrote:Don Jeffries Wrote:As Vincent Salandria first suggested, it appears the conspirators wanted us to know there was a conspiracy.
Salandria was quite correct.
If so, I don't understand the plotters' urgent need to alter or fabricate the Zapruder film.
in order to create an environment for conspiracy debate, evidence of said conspiracy needs to be removed from the most obvious photographic-film record, the Zapruder film. TWO shooters means conspiracy! Hence, a grassy knoll (from the front) shot, the TSBD 6th floor shot=2 shooters=conspiracy -- verses 3 shots from the 6th floor=1 shooter-LHO, hence the SBT= no conspiracy. And the debate has raged on for 40+ years.
Zapruder film legitimacy has been questioned since the late 60's, David Lifton one of the first.
World War III or a raging debate Mr. Riddle, your choice? Not rocket science. That "urgent" enough?
Is this an interview Mr. Riddle, shall I expect to see my opinion published elsewhere?
I don't know what your problem is, Mr. Healy. I asked Charles, if the plotters wanted us to know there was a conspiracy, why would they attempt to remove the evidence of it from the Zapruder film. Maybe his reply is stuck in the moderators' traffic jam. You, on the other hand, appear to be looking for a fight with someone.
You say "in order to create an environment for conspiracy debate, evidence of said conspiracy needs to be removed from the most obvious photographic-film record, the Zapruder film." That's a wonderful theory, with one tiny problem. The evidence of a shot from the front wasn't removed.
But let's all take a break and watch this.