03-09-2013, 07:28 AM
[TABLE="width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD="width: 84%"]
[TR]
[TD="width: 60%"][/TD]
[TD="width: 40%"] 9/2/13[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[TD="width: 16%"]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
cross posted from Acronym TV
It is growing increasingly possible that public outcry might make the Imperialforce of American Exceptionalism, with its humanitarian war sights set onSyria, back down.
by Acronym TV
New evidence is surfacing about just who might be behind the chemical attacks, with a credible view published by a journalist with 20 years middle East pointing toevidence that the Saudis could have supplied the Rebel forces with chemicalweapons and, in the untrained hands of the rebels, the Chemical Weaponsdetonated in a tragic accident. This, of course, flies in the face of thethesis put forward by Obama, who claims that the Assad regime was so brazenlyviolating international norms that he needed to be dethroned, or at the veryleast, sent a very strong message visa vie hellfire missiles reigning down froma US lead coalition of the willing. That the drone commander in chief does notsee drone strikes in countries that have not declared war on US to be somethingwithin the set of acceptable international norms should be an impeachableoffense in and of itself. Now that the U.S. has lost the leading lap-dog (theU.K.) in it's coalition of the willing standing at the ready to march in lockstep with whatever our next move on the Armageddon chessboard that is theMiddle East might be, what will congress do when they reconvene on September 9[SUP]th[/SUP]?
[TR]
[TD="width: 84%"]
Syrian Rebels Claim Saudi Prince Bandar Responsible For Chemical Weapons Attack
By Dennis Trainor, Jr. [TABLE="width: 100%"][TR]
[TD="width: 60%"][/TD]
[TD="width: 40%"] 9/2/13[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[TD="width: 16%"]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
cross posted from Acronym TV
It is growing increasingly possible that public outcry might make the Imperialforce of American Exceptionalism, with its humanitarian war sights set onSyria, back down.
by Acronym TV
New evidence is surfacing about just who might be behind the chemical attacks, with a credible view published by a journalist with 20 years middle East pointing toevidence that the Saudis could have supplied the Rebel forces with chemicalweapons and, in the untrained hands of the rebels, the Chemical Weaponsdetonated in a tragic accident. This, of course, flies in the face of thethesis put forward by Obama, who claims that the Assad regime was so brazenlyviolating international norms that he needed to be dethroned, or at the veryleast, sent a very strong message visa vie hellfire missiles reigning down froma US lead coalition of the willing. That the drone commander in chief does notsee drone strikes in countries that have not declared war on US to be somethingwithin the set of acceptable international norms should be an impeachableoffense in and of itself. Now that the U.S. has lost the leading lap-dog (theU.K.) in it's coalition of the willing standing at the ready to march in lockstep with whatever our next move on the Armageddon chessboard that is theMiddle East might be, what will congress do when they reconvene on September 9[SUP]th[/SUP]?
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass