John Armstrong's Harvey and Lee

[Jim Hargrove]

I already said I think there is evidence that Oswald was impersonated at various points.

What am I saying is that the photos are not evidence of an Oswald double from 1947 onwards. I'm sorry but I just honestly don't see it

There is nothing in those photos that is proof of two people.

That's what I am saying and I don't believe I'm the only JFK CT that thinks that.

There does appear to be documents that suggest Oswald was in two places at the same time which could be down to identity theft by intelligence agents. Does Case Nagell look like Oswald? Does the Mexican embassy guy look like Oswald?

I totally reject a Marguerite double, I believe that is her in the young and old pictures.

I think the Harvey and Lee (as dopplegangers) thing is the equivalent of 9/11 no planes.

Identity salting and theft, document shenanigans - yes, elaborate body doubles from childhood - no. It's just way too complicated.

John,

Everyone seems to have an opinion about the photographs, but you also have to take into account what eyewitnesses said back in the day. You discount John Pic's estimate that step-father Ekdahl was over 6 feet tall, but whose opinion should we count more, John Pic's or yours? Pic got the other details of Ekdahl right on the money: glasses and hair color.

By the same token, consider these two famous photos, taken roughly a year apart:

[ATTACH=CONFIG]5275[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]5276[/ATTACH]

When shown the photo at left, John Pic said it did not appear to be his brother. Should we believe you, that these two are the same boys, or should we believe LEE Oswald's own half-brother, who said they didn't appear to be?

Jim