John Armstrong's Harvey and Lee

[Peter Lemkin]

Mr. Mooney, you avoid questions posed to you; you avoid looking at the wide spectrum of evidence and focus on micro-issues - attacking them with a seeming agenda, one by one. What's the game you're playing and are you so narrow minded or not really against the official version? I took GREAT offense at your snide statements about Jack White, who I often worked with, and considered a close friend and champion of JFK research. You made it sound as if his choice of clothes were wrong, this would affect his research on JFK. What in the world is your overall view of what happened in and around 11/22/63?! - as it seems like you paint a very simplified 'stick-figure drawing' of what was a most complex, intricate, highly compartmentalized operation; and then equally complex, intricate, highly compartmentalized cover-up. Add to that you expound upon and condemn books you have not read nor researched. I really begin to wonder what your agenda is here. IMO, the events of Dallas can never be considered 'too complex'. It was a MOST complex and convoluted operation; complete with false actors, blind research/investigation trails, fake and planted 'evidence', stolen evidence, denied evidence, tampered evidence, threatened and murdered witnesses, and more. You paint, IMO, a simple, almost cartoonish version of about three frames in length - one too simple to be believable, from the massive and complex evidence at hand.