20-09-2013, 06:45 PM
David Josephs Wrote:DONT bother going to the links of the infamous 7 Greg offers up for 1953... or even read the one example I posted.... (if you were to bother going to these links you'd see each and every "statement" is identical save for the name of the person, not a single one is signed by the supposed witness interviewed... and not one is called to testify..
no one is asked about the 53-54 year.... why do you suppose that is John?
Myra DeRouse is not called, her statements ignored... why John?
Dr. Kurian's reports and descriptions of the small HARVEY - not interesed?
With regards to Beauregard...
when I did finally find the Asst Principal HEAD explanation of the school days, AS I ALSO POSTED, I find that Greg's analysis was incorrect and my agreeing with him premature.
THIS is the quality of supporting evidence Mr Parker used to - how'd you put it? - "eat me up"... and the type of evidence you're willing to accept as definitive...
[.....]
You want to post GREG's rebuttals as your own support - I guess that's up to GREG and you... yet if you're not even going to check his sources before you declare some hollow victory,
what's the point of having this discussion at all?
Thank you for this absolutely stunning post, David! It never occurred to me that Mr. Parker would be so loose with his evidence, or that others would promote it without even looking at it, and so I didn't check it. Sure glad you did!
Jim