20-09-2013, 06:51 PM
John Mooney Wrote:Charles Drago Wrote:John Mooney Wrote:Back up your claim that reasonable answers have already been given.
Back up your claim to be a researcher.
Do your own work.
Charles it's a fair question.
What was the reason for creating two Oswalds in 1952?
How can I find something that isn't there?
Someone could put me straight though and make me look stupid very easily?
The goal here is not to make anyone look stupid John... maybe therein lies the problem? You think this is about winning and losing arguments when this is about defining the conspiracy(ies), the players and their roles.
We EXPECT you can read into a subject, use GOOGLE, ask peers, go to a library, BUY a book - whatever it takes - to compile the information to offer an INFORMED OPINION that YOU arrive at
and then SUPPORT IT with the information you used...
otherwise you appear as a parrot - one gladly assuming the task of making you look stupid without any outside assistance.
There is an entire HISTORY OF THE COLD WAR, CIA & MILITARY INTELLIGENCE that you have obviously missed...
Entire programs designed to take advantage of the influx of refugees after WWII.... and build networks to combat the "communist threat"
Charles and the others have you nailed John... a bit of preparation for these discussions is in order...
and at least the token understanding of what CONTEXT means in these discussions.
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter