24-09-2013, 11:42 AM
Peter Lemkin Wrote:While a minority view on JFK, I'm aware, I believe JFK had two 'marks' against him for which he was murdered on the public stage. Most agree on the first, that being his turn away from their control and toward democracy, Peace, Justice, something approximating the lip-service and Potemkin Constitution and Laws, etc. The second was that he, as many others of the time, was beginning that personal inner exploration, that 'they' know can all-too-often lead to freedom from control - all too dangerous for a President, dangerous as well for the Plebs. While not the only partner of his in this kind of self-exploration, I believe M.P. Meyers was very pivotal and they regularly smoked grass and more than a few times took hallucinogens and imagined a world different than it was....or we are taught to believe it is.
The implications are inclusive of other events known. I say this near demands consideration. An intersection of the two 'marks' is more than just interesting. The self exploration may have triggered the reactionary warpigs faction across the river and those they play hands for. All immediately dangerous to the jerks and also dangerous in the long view.
Thanks Peter,
Jim
Read not to contradict and confute;
nor to believe and take for granted;
nor to find talk and discourse;
but to weigh and consider.
FRANCIS BACON
nor to believe and take for granted;
nor to find talk and discourse;
but to weigh and consider.
FRANCIS BACON