12-10-2013, 07:06 PM
Keith,
For the second time: this thread is about Judge John Tunheim. There is the potential for an important discussion about the role he played both during and after the ARRB. He was one of principal government officials administering the ARRB, yet he has steadfastly avoided discussing publicly some of the major revelations of his committee.
Again, there is no evidence that you have even glanced at my article. Discussions on this site invariably get sidetracked by irrelevant, personal opinions exactly like yours. If you were concerned about such issues as my personal reputation, then the appropriate venue would have been to send me a note through the "Private Messages" link on this site.
These threads are only as good as contributions made by its members. Postings like yours are one of the reasons people simply stop reading a thread.
James
For the second time: this thread is about Judge John Tunheim. There is the potential for an important discussion about the role he played both during and after the ARRB. He was one of principal government officials administering the ARRB, yet he has steadfastly avoided discussing publicly some of the major revelations of his committee.
Again, there is no evidence that you have even glanced at my article. Discussions on this site invariably get sidetracked by irrelevant, personal opinions exactly like yours. If you were concerned about such issues as my personal reputation, then the appropriate venue would have been to send me a note through the "Private Messages" link on this site.
These threads are only as good as contributions made by its members. Postings like yours are one of the reasons people simply stop reading a thread.
James