14-10-2013, 06:33 PM
Arguably the most pernicious of all JFK Assassination related rabbit holes -- the so-called police dictabelt "acoustic evidence" -- is now getting big-time attention in the Major Media.
http://www.cbsnews.c...ok-author-says/
But the strongest official confirmation for conspiracy buffs came in 1979 when the House Select Committee on Assassinations concluded that President Kennedy was "probably assassinated as the result of a conspiracy." A key piece of evidence was an audio recording that the committee believed captured the sound of four gunshots being fired.
Looks like "conspiracy buffs" got hoodwinked.
The strongest evidence of conspiracy is JFK's T3 back wound, the existence of which is confirmed by the bullet holes in the clothing, the verified death certificate, the verified autopsy face sheet, the FBI report on the autopsy, and the consensus statements of at least 15 eye witnesses.
But the HSCA found this to be politically radiocative, imho. It meant that the autopsy photo showing the posterior wound was inauthentic.
House investigator Gaeton Fonzi promoted the clothing holes as definitive evidence of conspiracy, not the dictabelt.
But the HSCA wasn't going to open that sore, so the dictabelt was a way to conclude 95% with the fact of conspiracy while keeping the real evidence on the down-low.
The JFK Assassination Critical Research Community fell for this scam, big-time, and thus the JFK Assassination Porn industry was born.
Rather than point to the 100% certainty that the wound in JFK's back was too low to have been associated with the throat wound, the Critical Community runs riot with pet theories based on nothing that go no where -- except to the annual Assassination Porn Conventions, of course.
Garbage like Larry Sabato's faux debunking of faux evidence occurs because ":the Critics" can't rally around the prima facie case, as that would threaten all those precious pet theories and might dynamite rabbit holes like the "acoustics evidence".
Can't have that, can we?
http://www.cbsnews.c...ok-author-says/
But the strongest official confirmation for conspiracy buffs came in 1979 when the House Select Committee on Assassinations concluded that President Kennedy was "probably assassinated as the result of a conspiracy." A key piece of evidence was an audio recording that the committee believed captured the sound of four gunshots being fired.
Looks like "conspiracy buffs" got hoodwinked.
The strongest evidence of conspiracy is JFK's T3 back wound, the existence of which is confirmed by the bullet holes in the clothing, the verified death certificate, the verified autopsy face sheet, the FBI report on the autopsy, and the consensus statements of at least 15 eye witnesses.
But the HSCA found this to be politically radiocative, imho. It meant that the autopsy photo showing the posterior wound was inauthentic.
House investigator Gaeton Fonzi promoted the clothing holes as definitive evidence of conspiracy, not the dictabelt.
But the HSCA wasn't going to open that sore, so the dictabelt was a way to conclude 95% with the fact of conspiracy while keeping the real evidence on the down-low.
The JFK Assassination Critical Research Community fell for this scam, big-time, and thus the JFK Assassination Porn industry was born.
Rather than point to the 100% certainty that the wound in JFK's back was too low to have been associated with the throat wound, the Critical Community runs riot with pet theories based on nothing that go no where -- except to the annual Assassination Porn Conventions, of course.
Garbage like Larry Sabato's faux debunking of faux evidence occurs because ":the Critics" can't rally around the prima facie case, as that would threaten all those precious pet theories and might dynamite rabbit holes like the "acoustics evidence".
Can't have that, can we?