03-11-2013, 03:44 PM
Summers has changed some parts of his book as presented in http://jfkfacts.org/assassination/jfk-ed...-the-crap/
He congratulates Dale Myers for his work on Tippit, he has dropped the Clinton incident and downplayed Ferrie's importance and "...demolishing much of the shaky stuff propagated since the Garrison circus."
I have ordered his book and i am awaiting to read it. It seems that there is a new wave of thinking, by researchers who think of themselves as the "factual" researchers in contrast to the "conspiracy theorists" who have failed in their approach as much as the LN proponents. This new wave thinking promises to bring a change in approach that will replace the outdated approach of the "conspiracy theorists" who have failed to prove anything. They also believe that nothing is certain, some of them believe that the case will never be solved, and they mock Garrrison and his importance. They also pay too much importance to hidden documents that may or may not prove anything sinister, while ignoring the rest of the evidence. I am curious as to where this new thinking will lead us to.
He congratulates Dale Myers for his work on Tippit, he has dropped the Clinton incident and downplayed Ferrie's importance and "...demolishing much of the shaky stuff propagated since the Garrison circus."
I have ordered his book and i am awaiting to read it. It seems that there is a new wave of thinking, by researchers who think of themselves as the "factual" researchers in contrast to the "conspiracy theorists" who have failed in their approach as much as the LN proponents. This new wave thinking promises to bring a change in approach that will replace the outdated approach of the "conspiracy theorists" who have failed to prove anything. They also believe that nothing is certain, some of them believe that the case will never be solved, and they mock Garrrison and his importance. They also pay too much importance to hidden documents that may or may not prove anything sinister, while ignoring the rest of the evidence. I am curious as to where this new thinking will lead us to.