27-11-2013, 12:03 PM
Why is it in the "public interest" to keep this secret, and why would revealing these documents "damage the national interest" to the "highest degree"?
Do I smell US or other close Allies involvement here - or am I imagining things?
Do I smell US or other close Allies involvement here - or am I imagining things?
Quote:Alexander Litvinenko: William Hague wins secrecy fight over inquest
High Court judges counter coroner's call to reveal details of protected documents
JOHN ASTON
Wednesday 27 November 2013
The Government has won a High Court order to prevent the partial lifting of a secrecy order affecting the proposed inquest into the death of former KGB spy Alexander Litvinenko.
Foreign Secretary William Hague succeeded in overturning coroner Sir Robert Owen's decision to reveal documents currently kept confidential by a public interest immunity (PII) certificate.
The coroner argued that disclosure was necessary for a "fair and meaningful" inquest.
Government lawyers contended the documents are "sensitive to the highest degree" and public disclosure would damage the national interest.
Today Lord Justice Goldring, sitting with two other judges, quashed Sir Robert's decision, saying: "I am driven to the conclusion that the weight the coroner gave to the views of the Secretary of State was insufficient and amounted to an error of law."
Mr Litvinenko, 43, a Russian dissident and former KGB agent, was poisoned in 2006 by radioactive polonium-210 while drinking tea during a meeting with former security colleagues at the Millennium Hotel in Grosvenor Square, London. He died three weeks later.
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
Carl Jung - Aion (1951). CW 9, Part II: P.14