The case against the NIST WTC 7 collapse initiation analysis

[Jeffrey Orling]

Column 79 failing was not the cause of the collapse of 7WTC. Column 79 collapsed when the structures UNDER it failed. So NIST was wrong, but that does not mean the collapse was a result of CD. But sure.. knock yourselves out showing NIST made errors. They did with the twin towers as well. But there too errors in their explanation does not mean that the destruction was a controlled demolition. NIST, it turns out is hardly any different in their precision / engineering / science than any number of other people who have suggested various explanations such as DEWs or mini nukes or nano thermite... column79 or sagging trusses... not to mention CD... All flawed, but all match some of the observations.... but not all.

You can't prove something by disproving or falsifying something else.