01-12-2013, 03:19 PM
Don Jeffries Wrote:Asking us to "prove" that Pitzer filmed the autopsy is akin to trying to "prove" there was a conspiracy. Those invested in their beliefs will always claim the evidence is suspect. I am shocked that Martin, or anyone else, would not be skeptical of everything that went on at Bethesda during the autopsy, including who was and wasn't "officially" there.
I know this revisionist look at Pitzer's death, which was always included among the mysterious ones Penn Jones and others tabulated so many years ago, was started by Alan Eaglesham. I've exchanged cordial emails with Alan over the years, and have no ax to grind here. But I think this seems to be a personal thing with him, prodded on by his relationship with Dan Marvin.
I think it's still likely that Pitzer was murdered, and Dennis David seems credible to me. Like so many parts of this case, we don't need Pitzer to have been murdered to demonstrate that a lot of witnesses died very conveniently. We also don't need it to prove conspiracy. But there is no reason to reject it out of hand, as too many researchers have done in recent years, with various aspects that once were considered primary indicators of conspiracy. And there certainly isn't "hundreds of times more evidence" that Oswald killed Kennedy.
No offense, Don, but what the hell are you talking about?
A conspiracy in the JFK assassination has been proven through eyewitness, medical, filmed, and acoustical evidence - as well as an abundance of circumstantial proof. The supposed Pitzer film is something for which there is no supporting evidence (beyond David's story). How can you even compare the two?
Let me ask a simple question: Why would it even have been necessary for the CIA (or whoever) to kill Pitzer whilst leaving everybody else present at the autopsy alive?