02-12-2013, 09:34 PM
David,
You wrote: "Step one of this evidence is whether the autopsy reveals the telltale signs of suicide... close contact marks on the skin at the entry point and powder burns on the hand which fired the pistol..."
World renowned forensics expert Professor Herbert L. MacDonnell wrote a detailed report which concluded, "Based upon the agreement of the four above points, I conclude that William Bruce Pitzer's death was the result of a self-inflected gunshot wound. It is almost impossible that someone could have shot him and accidentally done so within the above considerations."
You know, MacDonnel does know his stuff. Seriously. As does Dr. Cyril Wecht who said "...this has all the characteristics of a suicidal wound." I'm not gonna question these two men who are both brilliant at what they do and both extremely independent minded. There is no known forensic evidence of murder. Period.
You wrote: "Step two of this evidence is to corroborate that Pitzer did indeed film the autopsy room PRIOR to 8pm"
Go ahead. Find credible witness testimony to place him there. Find a single document that places him at Bethesda that night. Then find evidence that he was filming the autopsy.
You wrote: "Fromwhat I read Pitzer was getting ready to embark on a private career and gave no indication of suicidal tendencies."
Harold Rydberg wrote: "His wife stated "he loved the military, and would never think of committing suicideon a military base, that would be embarrassing to the military and to his career." However, I stand by my theory of loss of identity with upcoming retirement fromthe military, and complications of his making. He was a walking poster for themilitary. He was looked up to all who knew him. There were signs of suicide: on the evening he was last seen he was not neat andtidy; shooting the pistol after a class, even though they were blanks, was irrational;and having a .38 cartridge for the pistol (having signed out blanks), indicatespremeditation."
You wrote: "Martin... we have Benavidas' brother being shot, thinking it was him, cause he SAW someone yet could not be identified as our OSWALD"
Irrelevant. Has nothing to do with the Pitzer suicide.
You wrote: "In this case we have a man KNOWN to have CCTV in the morgue"
Known how? What documentation do we have of this claim?
You wrote: "who shows the results to his friend DD who in turn describes the pre-altered wounds exactly."
Years later, after many books have been published on the subject claiming there was a big difference between what was seen at Parkland and Bethesda.
You wrote: "Why DD has not been removed from the equation has always puzzled me"
It doesn't puzzle me in the slightest.
You wrote: "If you are going to say Pitzer was Suicide, in the face of evidence against such a conclusion if reviewed in the REAL world of cause and effect, I think you must also be calling DD a liar about where Pitzer was that night..."
David could be lying. Or he could be mistaken. It was a very long time before he was asked what he saw that night. Human memory is easily influenced and confused.
You wrote: "Can you point to any questions asked of any of the Bethesda witnesses about whether Pitzer WAS there...
in all my reading I cannot remember anyone being asked about Pitzer"
IIRC William Matson Law asked some of those interviewed for his book.
You wrote: "Finally - since DD was not in the autopsy room... any idea why he would make this part up about Pitzer?
Or how he would know about the exact location of the wounds?"
Already addressed this point. The Parkland descriptions were published in numerous books before Dennis David told his story.
[size=12]
[/SIZE]
You wrote: "Step one of this evidence is whether the autopsy reveals the telltale signs of suicide... close contact marks on the skin at the entry point and powder burns on the hand which fired the pistol..."
World renowned forensics expert Professor Herbert L. MacDonnell wrote a detailed report which concluded, "Based upon the agreement of the four above points, I conclude that William Bruce Pitzer's death was the result of a self-inflected gunshot wound. It is almost impossible that someone could have shot him and accidentally done so within the above considerations."
You know, MacDonnel does know his stuff. Seriously. As does Dr. Cyril Wecht who said "...this has all the characteristics of a suicidal wound." I'm not gonna question these two men who are both brilliant at what they do and both extremely independent minded. There is no known forensic evidence of murder. Period.
You wrote: "Step two of this evidence is to corroborate that Pitzer did indeed film the autopsy room PRIOR to 8pm"
Go ahead. Find credible witness testimony to place him there. Find a single document that places him at Bethesda that night. Then find evidence that he was filming the autopsy.
You wrote: "Fromwhat I read Pitzer was getting ready to embark on a private career and gave no indication of suicidal tendencies."
Harold Rydberg wrote: "His wife stated "he loved the military, and would never think of committing suicideon a military base, that would be embarrassing to the military and to his career." However, I stand by my theory of loss of identity with upcoming retirement fromthe military, and complications of his making. He was a walking poster for themilitary. He was looked up to all who knew him. There were signs of suicide: on the evening he was last seen he was not neat andtidy; shooting the pistol after a class, even though they were blanks, was irrational;and having a .38 cartridge for the pistol (having signed out blanks), indicatespremeditation."
You wrote: "Martin... we have Benavidas' brother being shot, thinking it was him, cause he SAW someone yet could not be identified as our OSWALD"
Irrelevant. Has nothing to do with the Pitzer suicide.
You wrote: "In this case we have a man KNOWN to have CCTV in the morgue"
Known how? What documentation do we have of this claim?
You wrote: "who shows the results to his friend DD who in turn describes the pre-altered wounds exactly."
Years later, after many books have been published on the subject claiming there was a big difference between what was seen at Parkland and Bethesda.
You wrote: "Why DD has not been removed from the equation has always puzzled me"
It doesn't puzzle me in the slightest.
You wrote: "If you are going to say Pitzer was Suicide, in the face of evidence against such a conclusion if reviewed in the REAL world of cause and effect, I think you must also be calling DD a liar about where Pitzer was that night..."
David could be lying. Or he could be mistaken. It was a very long time before he was asked what he saw that night. Human memory is easily influenced and confused.
You wrote: "Can you point to any questions asked of any of the Bethesda witnesses about whether Pitzer WAS there...
in all my reading I cannot remember anyone being asked about Pitzer"
IIRC William Matson Law asked some of those interviewed for his book.
You wrote: "Finally - since DD was not in the autopsy room... any idea why he would make this part up about Pitzer?
Or how he would know about the exact location of the wounds?"
Already addressed this point. The Parkland descriptions were published in numerous books before Dennis David told his story.
[size=12]
[/SIZE]