05-12-2013, 12:03 AM
Yes, his post earlier in the year in May is well worth a look:
www.chrisspivey.co.uk/stop-step-back-and-think
In it he contrasts images downloaded from the Web of people who have been butchered and decapitated with the photos of Lee Rigby lying in the road without a drop of blood anywhere, even though according to the Official Narrative he had just had his head chopped off. It's ridiculous. Whatever did or did not happen, these are not photos of a freshly-decapitated man.
Also, Chris Spivey asks how, given that Lee Rigby was wearing civvies, and a Help for Heroes sweat shirt, and was not leaving the Barracks, but returning from another part of town, the assailants knew he was a soldier. I expect this sticky point explains why the BBC News reporting the trial tonight made a big show of displaying the army backpack he was said to have been wearing at the time of the attack.
Still, the accused allegedly freely admitted it to cops at the time and in taped interviews.
What does it all mean?
www.chrisspivey.co.uk/stop-step-back-and-think
In it he contrasts images downloaded from the Web of people who have been butchered and decapitated with the photos of Lee Rigby lying in the road without a drop of blood anywhere, even though according to the Official Narrative he had just had his head chopped off. It's ridiculous. Whatever did or did not happen, these are not photos of a freshly-decapitated man.
Also, Chris Spivey asks how, given that Lee Rigby was wearing civvies, and a Help for Heroes sweat shirt, and was not leaving the Barracks, but returning from another part of town, the assailants knew he was a soldier. I expect this sticky point explains why the BBC News reporting the trial tonight made a big show of displaying the army backpack he was said to have been wearing at the time of the attack.
Still, the accused allegedly freely admitted it to cops at the time and in taped interviews.
What does it all mean?