11-12-2013, 06:43 PM
I've been banned from Wikipedia for trying to add correctly-referenced and sourced edits to their articles. When I showed the banning was wrong according to their own rules they responded with a lengthy set of procedures in order to apply for reinstatement that is an admirable example of legal obfuscation and double talk. I don't understand it it is so confusing. From what I can see it says even though we both know you are innocent you still have to prove you aren't a danger to Wikipedia. Wikipedia now wants donations so the public can support their own abuse by this machiavellian site.
Wikipedia is like the US Government. An excellent source you are forced to use while it screws you. I say starve them out.
Jimmy Wales is an ex internet porno developer from the McAdams homeland of the deep south. He is now in charge of the internet's main body of referenced information.
Wikipedia is like the US Government. An excellent source you are forced to use while it screws you. I say starve them out.
Jimmy Wales is an ex internet porno developer from the McAdams homeland of the deep south. He is now in charge of the internet's main body of referenced information.