17-12-2013, 01:07 AM
Yes, a bit (lot?) more enlightenment is needed on all sides.
David Guyatt Wrote:My whole take would be objectivity and science but fully drawn from a position of consciousness.
If a scientist is still largely unconscious (and plenty are as we know), or are ruled by their complexes, they are little better than the indian native believing in the witch doctor or ju-ju man. On the other hand, there are witch doctors and ju-ju men who have a broader spectrum of consciousness than many scientists, I think.
Science can't answer all the questions, at least yet, but some are trying hard. It's a case of "there's more things in heaven and earth Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx
"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.
“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.
"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.
“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.