15-01-2014, 08:29 PM
well after spending 30 minutes manipulating the image on the right on top of the image on the left using photoshop, transparency and size adjustments ...
(these ones: http://www.copweb.be/images/CE-133-all.jpg)
... I am forced to agree with you, DAVID.
If the one on the right is reduced to around 86-88 percent the entire bush on the right and the large fence line that is just to the left of that bush line up exactly ... but the entire stairs, shadows below them, the small picket fence, and even some leaves on the left do not line up.
I find it odd though that half the perspective is a match, but the other half is grossly incongruous. But i guess that is just optics for ya.
Any idea WHAT Oswald WAS referring to then?
Seems like he was on to something, but i'm drawing blanks now.
What did he see that he thought was reduced from another image?
(these ones: http://www.copweb.be/images/CE-133-all.jpg)
... I am forced to agree with you, DAVID.
If the one on the right is reduced to around 86-88 percent the entire bush on the right and the large fence line that is just to the left of that bush line up exactly ... but the entire stairs, shadows below them, the small picket fence, and even some leaves on the left do not line up.
I find it odd though that half the perspective is a match, but the other half is grossly incongruous. But i guess that is just optics for ya.
Any idea WHAT Oswald WAS referring to then?
Seems like he was on to something, but i'm drawing blanks now.
What did he see that he thought was reduced from another image?