How Gary Mack became Dan Rather ( Jim Di Eugenio)

[Paul Rigby]

Reply from Jim:

"No comment since 1.) I do not know what you are talking about or 2.)where that quote you use originated from or 3.) Where the "facts" in it originated, and 4.) You ignored my point.


So goodbye."


JIM D

My instinctive reaction to section VI stands: "Otherwise fine researcher, for reasons unclear to me, seeks to redeem fake film (more accurately, Z versions 1 & 2), and its equally bogus "legend," from clutches of discredited guardian (Mack) via classic false opposition (Groden v. Mack)." Now that's what I call interesting.