The WAR between JFK and CIA

[David Josephs]

David,

You may be right. The CIA plotters who set up "Oswald" as the fall guy may well have been following the commands of others. But I can't prove it and neither can you.

What we can prove, at the very least, is the CIA looked and behaved damned guilty. In your search for Deep connections elsewhere, why take the spotlight off the CIA?

Why let the CIA go? Why madly point everywhere else?

Direct evidence for the assassination points to the CIA. You can do all the Deep Political Thinking you want, but the EVIDENCE still points to the CIA.

If you have evidence against ONI or McGeorge Bundy or LBJ or Hoover or Curtis Lemay or the ghost of Marilyn Monroe, please post it here in the clearest and simplest terms possible.

And if you want to run with body alteration at Bethesda, be my guest, and lots of luck winning over the public with that.

Why not start squeezing the one organization we can definitely show was involved?

In a well-planned set-up of a Patsy, the evidence points to the Patsy... no? Doesn't make the evidence indicative of the reality.

In a well-orchestrated conspiracy, crime, or what-have-you - there still needs to be a Patsy behind the patsy... be it the dead girl who is not really dead but gets away with it (Body Heat)
or in this case a group that can weather the storm... that can stonewall for YEARS... those that are really good at it while also fighting for their own survival.

If you'd slow down a bit you'd see I am not letting the CIA off in the least... I am indicting the PEOPLE within the CIA who were the HITMEN... It would be nice if you would distinguish between the two.

If there was direct evidence that the ONI or Bundy were involved... you suppose it would be "obvious" like what the CIA feeds us?
or rather that it would even exist anymore? or existed in the first place.

This again is DEEP POLITICS... we have no idea who either Lee or Harvey was or worked for... you claim the CIA based on the evidence we have been allowed to see...
have you never encountered forged documents?

These are Harvey's notes on ZR-RIFLE - phony backdated 201's.... "planning should include provisions for blaming Sovs or Czechs in case of blow(back)"

So squeeze away Jim... and be happy and thankful with what we get? And assume the Obvious is the Truth....

To each his own - I choose to keep my eyes on the brass ring... not the phony carousel horse's cracking teeth...


[ATTACH=CONFIG]5783[/ATTACH]