The WAR between JFK and CIA

[Jim Hargrove]

In a well-planned set-up of a Patsy, the evidence points to the Patsy... no? Doesn't make the evidence indicative of the reality.

Plenty of evidence pointed to the Patsy. Enough to "fool" four government inquiries, and all our major news media.

In a well-orchestrated conspiracy, crime, or what-have-you - there still needs to be a Patsy behind the patsy... be it the dead girl who is not really dead but gets away with it (Body Heat) or in this case a group that can weather the storm... that can stonewall for YEARS... those that are really good at it while also fighting for their own survival.

I'll leave the patsy-behind-the-patsy philosophy to you. Let's talk about EVIDENCE!

If you'd slow down a bit you'd see I am not letting the CIA off in the least... I am indicting the PEOPLE within the CIA who were the HITMEN... It would be nice if you would distinguish between the two.

Now we're making progress. Please name the CIA agents you indict for the assassination of JFK.

Myself, I'm not so sure which agents to blame, though I do believe that officials at both the Miami and MC stations were involved. I'd rather go after the whole rat's nest and start shaking, just like a real prosecutor would.

If there was direct evidence that the ONI or Bundy were involved... you suppose it would be "obvious" like what the CIA feeds us?
or rather that it would even exist anymore? or existed in the first place.

So, we must ignore the evidence the "CIA feeds us" that the CIA killed JFK so we can go after McGeorge Bundy because evidence against him no longer exists? Is that the plan?

This again is DEEP POLITICS... we have no idea who either Lee or Harvey was or worked for... you claim the CIA based on the evidence we have been allowed to see... have you never encountered forged documents?

Holy Crap, Batman! You "have no idea who either Lee or Harvey was or worked for?"

Are you kidding?

Do you really support John Armstrong's work?

Jim "Amazed in America" Hargrove