18-03-2014, 04:55 PM
Cliff Varnell Wrote:It was a zero-sum game. Oswald/s' handlers were the losers. Oswald as Red Agent was reduced to a rumor.
That's why Oswald's CIA handlers always take the fall for the murder in a lot of people's eyes.
Not mine. Oswald and Mexico City are NOT the keys to the case.
You're at least half right here. The poor schmuck arrested in the Texas Theater was not a key to the case; he wasn't even a luggage tag on the case, BUT ....
You no doubt recall there was ANOTHER guy, apparently pretending to be Oswald, who was running around the Dallas area in the weeks leading up to the assassination making all kinds of scenes, ordering scopes for rifles, talking about high buildings, acting weird at a rifle range, talking about coming into money soon. THIS GUY, or his puppet master, knew Kennedy would soon be assassinated in or near Dallas from a high building with a rifle. Isn't that all you need to win the game of CLUE?
This is where the assassins met the flim-flam squad. Who was that guy framing "Lee Harvey Oswald" for the hit? I'll call him the birth Oswald, but, for simplicity's sake, you can just call him "that guy played by Burt Lancaster in Executive Action."
Cliff Varnell Wrote:JFK's body and the machinations in Washington DC the afternoon of 11/22/63 are the keys to the case.
The medical evidence is awfully controversial, but it wouldn't surprise me a bit if others in the USG were involved, but I just think the CIA played the starring role. On top of all the direct and indirect evidence, the whole thing just smells like an intelligence operation, doesn't it?
Cliff Varnell Wrote:It's a collegial disagreement between us, Jim. A bracing discussion!
I don't think charging CIA guys with treason and accessory to murder lets them off the hook.
The plot went a lot higher than Harvey et al.
Perhaps so, but if we can prove the involvement of agents like Harvey, I'll bet the CIA, even today, would help us find the higher-ups. <g> I'm enjoying the conversation also.
Jim