27-03-2014, 03:50 PM
Greg R Parker Wrote: Tonsillectomy as such should be reserved for those cases which are refractory in their nature or which create a dangerous level of toxins within the system.
Touche on me I guess. Hmm. However realize that the above description for the Osteopathic treatment of tonsils clearly distinguishes "tonsillectomy" as being the surgical removal of the tonsils and Marguerite clearly said "tonsillectomy". I'd imagine in her consultation with the doctor that he would clearly establish that his treatment was a holistic one and was not a tonsillectomy. I would imagine this would be a regular hurdle for such an experimental doctor that he routinely faced. One that defined his practice and had to be gotten across with each patient as the reason and purpose for his particular form of medicine. So, I find it difficult to accept that after getting that sales pitch for his form of medicine that Marguerite would refer to it as a common tonsillectomy when any mother who confronted that situation with Dr Philben would have had it made clear exactly what it was since, as you yourself show, there were serious medical license issues with it that were clearly understood. I think you also realize this from your entries. Dr Philben would have to had explained this was a non surgical procedure and was not a tonsillectomy, so why would Marguerite refer to it as such?