28-03-2014, 12:17 AM
Anthony,
You don't have to accuse someone of being part of COINTELPRO to question their arguments. In this case, Greg Parker is making an argument that would make David Von Pein blush. When faced with the ugly reality of tonsils that shouldn't logically be there, it is ludicrous to seriously suggest that the explanation is a fake tonsillectomy.
Again, if you want to question Armstrong's work in its totality, that's fine. But you can't expect to be taken seriously when you persist in doubting the validity of this doctor, when David Josephs has gone to extraordinary lengths to refute your contentions.
You don't have to accuse someone of being part of COINTELPRO to question their arguments. In this case, Greg Parker is making an argument that would make David Von Pein blush. When faced with the ugly reality of tonsils that shouldn't logically be there, it is ludicrous to seriously suggest that the explanation is a fake tonsillectomy.
Again, if you want to question Armstrong's work in its totality, that's fine. But you can't expect to be taken seriously when you persist in doubting the validity of this doctor, when David Josephs has gone to extraordinary lengths to refute your contentions.