30-03-2014, 08:40 PM
Dawn Meredith Wrote:Greg R Parker Wrote:Dawn Meredith Wrote:Bob Prudhomme Wrote:Inbreeding, indeed.
It is sad to see what a man will resort to when he runs out of arguments. I see no reason to continue this discussion.
Prepare to be ignored by the rest of the forum, as well, Mr. Parker.
PLEASE!!!! Parker has been asked several times now if he has actually READ the book.
His continual refusal to respond to this question IS a response.
Ignore, don't feed this. I am so damn sick of the infighting in the critical community.
And name calling. Put an end to this NOW. Stop responding to him. Continue to feed him and you all get what you deserve.
For those of us like myself with an extremely busy day job- attorney- who also works many weekends, I just do not have the time to read all this crap.
But we have to monitor it. This is our home and comments like "inbreeding" violate our forum rules.
Dawn
Dawn, you have asked that many times in the past. You are well aware that I have not read it - just as you have not read it in its entirety.
I may have violated forum rules, but you are displaying hypocrisy in not acknowledging I was replying in kind to the slurs being hurled my way. "Idiot", "fool", "bully" are among the epithets used against me here, for what? For trying to give David the "detailed discussion" on the H & L evidence he claims to want. Evidently, he only wants it discussed through the vision of one eye. That is no way to arrive at the facts of any matter.
If you replied I did not see it. And I read over 3/4 of the book when I first got it in 2009. It's a long book and very dense. I bought it at COPA along with several other books that year. I read all the others and most of this but then got crazy busy with work. I have begun re-reading it and taking notes.
Beyond this I am not reading these long detailed posts. Just don't have the time or energy. I was convinced after the first few chapters of Harvey and Lee. And even more convinced on second reading.
To argue with someone over a book not read is truly a waste of everyone's time.
Obey the rules. All of you.
I will not be replying further. But this post required a response. For clarification purposes only.
Dawn
Dawn,
Contrary to what you say, I am not attacking the book. I am attacking what is plastered all over the web purporting to represent what is in the book. That includes the official H & L website.
You can keep using your excuses to avoid reading what I have - but in the end, it is really just willful blindness. You, as a lawyer should know the value of the adversarial system. Why then, do you insist that only one side of this debate should ever be heard?