02-04-2014, 09:53 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-04-2014, 09:11 PM by Mitchell Severson.)
Wouldn't you think that these more available WCC bullets also reduced the accuracy of the shots fired by the riflemen attempting to duplicate "Oswald's" feat? I guess that would make them feel a bit better for their misses, but doesn't do any favors for the Warren Commission. One of the things that made me doubtful of the official story and led to my own study was the accuracy of the two back shots - one looks dead center on the head and the other is an inch or two of JFK's center line. Now we are supposed to believe that was done with half-assed bullets, shot at a slowly moving man, sitting in a car moving at varying speed. (And, technically, by a guy who was, at least, not likely in position).
The reason I find Robert's information-heavy posts about the rifle and bullets so relevant is that the LN community seems to think that as long as they can stretch out the shooting window they have answered the ciritics only relevant argument against the feasibility of the LN scenario. These posts are ammunition against that mistaken belief.
The reason I find Robert's information-heavy posts about the rifle and bullets so relevant is that the LN community seems to think that as long as they can stretch out the shooting window they have answered the ciritics only relevant argument against the feasibility of the LN scenario. These posts are ammunition against that mistaken belief.