02-04-2014, 09:49 PM
I have had limited time here since returning from vacation and this thread was begun while we were gone so I have not read most of it. Thus the comments below are from one of THE most respected JFK researchers in the world:
"The tonsillectomy topic all revolves around a single piece of paper in an FBI report, repeating third hand something that allegedly originated with Marguerite.
The John Armstrong faction adamantly insists that Marguerite is untrustworthy, and that FBI reports must be viewed with utmost skepticism. I wouldn't necessarily disagree.
Yet the same faction insists with equal adamance that this single piece of paper is genuine beyond doubt, despite the absence of corroboration from any source whatsoever.
"The FBI produced reams of fraudulent data with regards to the assassination of the president," according to a recent post by David Josephs. Yet the same man invokes a third hand citation from an FBI report as probative regarding the tonsillectomy. "
As this was a private email the senders id shall remain private. The purpose in posting it is the point is well worth considering, and sounds pretty decisive to me. Can't we just agree to disagree and get past all this nonsence. I mean really a ONE PAGE FBI report is causing this much discussion and sniping.
Dawn
"The tonsillectomy topic all revolves around a single piece of paper in an FBI report, repeating third hand something that allegedly originated with Marguerite.
The John Armstrong faction adamantly insists that Marguerite is untrustworthy, and that FBI reports must be viewed with utmost skepticism. I wouldn't necessarily disagree.
Yet the same faction insists with equal adamance that this single piece of paper is genuine beyond doubt, despite the absence of corroboration from any source whatsoever.
"The FBI produced reams of fraudulent data with regards to the assassination of the president," according to a recent post by David Josephs. Yet the same man invokes a third hand citation from an FBI report as probative regarding the tonsillectomy. "
As this was a private email the senders id shall remain private. The purpose in posting it is the point is well worth considering, and sounds pretty decisive to me. Can't we just agree to disagree and get past all this nonsence. I mean really a ONE PAGE FBI report is causing this much discussion and sniping.
Dawn