The Magic Tonsillectomy or Armstrong's Voodoo Science?

[Greg R Parker]

In post #139, GP refers to his position about LHO vs. to what I will call the H&L School. Can someone summarize these two schools of thought?

The Armstrong case for two Oswald's is a lot like the WC case for a lone assassin. It is built on often misunderstand, or deliberately reshaped circumstantial evidence - padded out with irrelvancies and bloated to a supersized burger for public consumption. Both can look appealing for those hungry enough for a solution. Just don't put the ingredients under a mcroscope!


The main difference is that whereas the WC never met an"Oswald sighting" it could accept - Armstrong never met one he could reject.


But both extremes were in support of a predetermined conclusion.