The Magic Tonsillectomy or Armstrong's Voodoo Science?

[Lauren Johnson]

In post #139, GP refers to his position about LHO vs. to what I will call the H&L School. Can someone summarize these two schools of thought?

The Armstrong case for two Oswald's is a lot like the WC case for a lone assassin. It is built on often misunderstand, or deliberately reshaped circumstantial evidence - padded out with irrelvancies and bloated to a supersized burger for public consumption. Both can look appealing for those hungry enough for a solution. Just don't put the ingredients under a mcroscope!


The main difference is that whereas the WC never met an"Oswald sighting" it could accept - Armstrong never met one he could reject.


But both extremes were in support of a predetermined conclusion.

Actually, Greg, you didn't spell out what you think about LHO in any positive sense. You compare the H&L school to the WC. That is an insult.

From my POV, you have made it clear that you have no respect for the H&L school. And yet at the same time, you do not put forth the kinds of things that are in your book. Why? In an IM, you told me, nobody asked. I asking. Greg, start your own thread and put forth your own theses.

To everyone: I wish at times, we functioned like an online journal in the JFK Forum. People submit articles that make an argument with supporting evidence with a conclusion. Respondents are invited to comment by pointing out strengths and weaknesses of the argument. Like Marlene and Dawn have said, these flame wars are just not acceptable.