Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Disappearing Mastoidectomy scar?
#18
David Josephs Wrote:
Jim Hargrove Wrote:
Greg R Parker Wrote:Bob, ignore me all you want. Though you just proved you can't. What should not be ignored is the message. The scar did not disappear and reappear, nor is there any need for a body switch to explain it. Medical science explains it. That needs to be acknowledged.


Your conjecture about the vanishing mastoidectomy scar is noted.

We are still waiting for your conjecture about a gunshot wound to his left elbow, the stitches that were required to close the wound, the .22 slug which he carried in his arm for a week before it was removed, and the separate incision that was made two inches above the wound to dig out the slug, and how those scars had apparently completely disappeared just six years later. This is the wound you called "very superficial."


Noted, yet not accepted... The Marine Corp forms upon his entry shows a 3" mastoid scar noted specifically as a #39: Identifying Body Marks, Scars, Tatoos

[ATTACH=CONFIG]5864[/ATTACH]


In Folsom Exh #1 page 10 we see administrative remarks jump from May 1957 to April 1958... with nothing to report for the October 27, 1957 discharge of his weapon until the trial which finally takes place in April 1958.

Another interesting piece of history overlooked regarding this gunshot episode... CE1961 tells us that from 10/27/57 (the day of the shooting) Oswald is at the Hospital until Nov 15 - over 2 weeks for this little injury seems a bit long to me... and then for it to have been determined a year later that it is was in the line of duty even though it was also determined (and he was reprimanded) for having a personal weapon... and NOT the .45 issued him.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]5863[/ATTACH]


And finally... when he leaves the Marines... we have the mastoid scar at 1" now, and the scar to his left elbow and hand noted....again, as #39: Identifying Marks...
One would think that when the police are looking for a specific individual, their IDENTIFYING MARKS would be of some importance in proving they had the right person...

If one was to read the autopsy, one might conclude that the person Rose autopsied was NOT the same as this person leaving the military... as none of the surgical marks which Identified him when he entered and left the Marines were noted on his body at the time.... And all the close-up photos of Oswald's autopsy are not available...




[ATTACH=CONFIG]5865[/ATTACH]


So what do we have after the Autopsy performed by Dr Rose? No note of a Mastoid scar, no note of the Elbow scar and nothing on his left hand...
All observed visually upon military examination, as opposed to NOT being observed or noted after hours examining the body for an autopsy...




[ATTACH=CONFIG]5866[/ATTACH]
The Report Of Medical Examination indicates that LHO had a Mastoid operation in 1945, but on another thread there is posted evidence that a Mastoid operation was performed in February, 1946. So, it would appear that either a misstatement, a misunderstanding, or an information entry error occurred when the form was processed.
::face.palm::

Larry
StudentofAssassinationResearch

Reply


Messages In This Thread
The Disappearing Mastoidectomy scar? - by LR Trotter - 08-04-2014, 04:46 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)