02-05-2014, 06:23 PM
There is a whole cottage industry of WC loyalists who work hard to discredit Mark Lane's Liberty Lobby defense and the assumed conclusions about E. Howard Hunt's possible involvement. The attacks often begin with swipes at Spotlight for being anti-Semitic and Mark Lane for being a sleazy publicity hound, and it pretty much goes downhill from there.
The most conservative interpretation of the case, though, may be that a jury determined that a magazine article accusing the CIA's Hunt of participating in the assassination at least did not recklessly disregard the truth. The quote from the jury forewoman, though, if accurate, is interesting indeed!
The most conservative interpretation of the case, though, may be that a jury determined that a magazine article accusing the CIA's Hunt of participating in the assassination at least did not recklessly disregard the truth. The quote from the jury forewoman, though, if accurate, is interesting indeed!