Guido Preparata's website

[R.K. Locke]

Does anyone find the claim that Alan Dulles wanted to destroy the British Empire credible?

It is completely credible. The War and Peace Studies Group of the Council on Foreign Relations made the dismantling of the British Empire a key aim. One reason, I suppose why this study is still not available for public scrutiny. This study ran from 1939-45 and Dulles "led" the Armaments Group.

Shoup & MInter's Imperial Brain Trust - The Council on Foreign Relations and United States Foreign Policy is the key available book here, for it shows, in brief, what the War & Peace Studies Group ambitions were. The British Empire had to be dismantled in order for the new American Empire to arise.

Historically, it had been the ambition of the Rhodes-Milner Kintergarden to extend and develop the British Empire to become the global dominating force. But Rhodes eventually understood that this was not possible without the USA - and they wouldn't play that game. Instead they wanted to be the governing empire themselves. Rhodes ultimately decided that Great Britain would throw it's lot in with the USA and proceed with the original plan with Britain becoming the junior partner.

It is also worth bearing in mind that the CFR was the sister organization of Chatham House (Royal Institute of International Affairs), itself a creation of the Rhodes "Group". The RIIA was founded in 1919 during the Paris peace conference where, co-incidentally, the Dulles brothers were both present and plied their trade.

In short, this is the New World Order.

PS, I have linked a brief synopsis of the RIIA/CFR nexus above (Chatham House) by the CorbetT Report, which is worth reading.

David, thanks for the interesting and thoughtful reply. I think what I found curious about Fursov's statement was more the insinuation that Dulles was out to destroy the British Empire rather than simply to reconfigure it in America's image. Perhaps this is just an issue of semantics? The impression that it gave was of a schism between the British elite and their counterparts in America when all indications are that this transfer of power* was part of the plan all along (or at least, from the period soon after Rhodes died.)

* By this I of course mean the superficial transfer of a power that had in fact been transnational in its dimensions for centuries previously.


In regards to The Jewish Question, well, I would very much like to see this discussed, but I understand perfectly well why people are reticent to do so. It's difficult to even discuss Israel's dreadful treatment of the Palestinians without being smeared as anti-Semitic in the current climate, so it's little surprise that a subject like this is virtually untouchable in public discourse, no matter how innocent your intentions may be.