04-06-2014, 02:53 AM
If the car was hacked, or disabled by some beam weapon, and that caused his death, why would it be necessary to cremate his body to remove evidence? Seems to me you'd want the drugs, and the trauma wounds, to be independently verifiable by some second source. You would only include "cremation of the body" (above and beyond the cremation at the crash site) in your plan in order to hide the cause of, or the time of, death. Or perhaps the exact nature of the trace amphetamines in his system. But if you've gone to the trouble of poisoning him in some subtle way, why blow up his car?
There is another bothersome aspect. The witness that saw sparks coming out from underneath the car implies that the engine or the transmission got loose before the crash. If the engine and transmission had been left behind, there would really be no way for a hacker to cause the car to hit a tree. Further, I doubt that hacking a car's software, or using an EM beam, imparts the option to 'eject" the car's engine or transmission. There must be more than one thing happening here to account for all these events.
There is another bothersome aspect. The witness that saw sparks coming out from underneath the car implies that the engine or the transmission got loose before the crash. If the engine and transmission had been left behind, there would really be no way for a hacker to cause the car to hit a tree. Further, I doubt that hacking a car's software, or using an EM beam, imparts the option to 'eject" the car's engine or transmission. There must be more than one thing happening here to account for all these events.