11-07-2014, 06:53 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-07-2014, 07:09 PM by Albert Doyle.)
Smarter and more honest researchers would realize that the fact Jones said Yates told him about the hitch-hiker, because the hitch-hiker had coincidentally repeated the same story about shooting JFK from an office building, automatically precludes the source of this story being mental illness. It proves the story was based on fact and its origin was based on an event a second party confirmed. Only a fool would ignore this, take the side of the FBI murderers, and use their exact method of impugning Yates' mental status without hesitating or feeling a need for caution. Only fools would contend both Yates and Jones decided to invent this crazy story out of nowhere.
It's kind of stupid to take the word of FBI murderers that Yates' lie detector test was "inconclusive" when FBI had a motive to deny Yates' witnessing. Smart researchers would see that FBI lied when it said "inconclusive" in order to cover-up the real truth-verifying result that they privately admitted to Dorothy. Those doubters, of course, contend that Dorothy also decided to invent a nutty story while they defend the FBI in the assassination (duh). Those doubters are really "Skeptics". If you check out the Randi Skeptic site it is populated by similar Lone Nut trolls with similar methods.
It's kind of stupid to take the word of FBI murderers that Yates' lie detector test was "inconclusive" when FBI had a motive to deny Yates' witnessing. Smart researchers would see that FBI lied when it said "inconclusive" in order to cover-up the real truth-verifying result that they privately admitted to Dorothy. Those doubters, of course, contend that Dorothy also decided to invent a nutty story while they defend the FBI in the assassination (duh). Those doubters are really "Skeptics". If you check out the Randi Skeptic site it is populated by similar Lone Nut trolls with similar methods.