US/NATO War on Russia

[Lauren Johnson]

It should now be abundantly clear that another crash of a Malaysian Boeing 777 over Ukraine is some kind of black op with indications pointing at the US/NATO/Ukraine axis as the perps. The final piece that situates this explanation is that the Western press has a unified position -- Putin, Putin, Putin, and so on. This position has been disseminated with breathtaking speed. And now we have Samantha Power speaking before the UN saying that the missiles could not have been fired without Russian help. Obama says ""This outrageous event underscores that it is time for peace and security to be restored in Ukraine," Obama said, adding that Russia had failed to use its influence to curb rebel violence." Europe is not being pressured to put an end to this war, once and for all. Does this mean NATO/UN "peacekeepers?"

That the Ukrainian Maidan was nothing more than a Western orchestrated putsch and should be seen as an act of war against Russia.

The question that remains is how far are Western powers willing to go? After this act of sacrificing an air liner to further their agendas, the answer has to be that Putin will be dared and even forced to intervene. So far, he has been the master of the diplomatic rope-a-dope. We now know how far the Western powers are willing to go to bring about a hotter war. Is an intermediate goal to force a direct conflict between UN peacekeepers and the Russian military?