US/NATO War on Russia

[Lauren Johnson]

From a commenter The Saker's website:

Larchmonter445 said...The Pivot to Asia is centered on Malaysia.

The US Navy demands its hegemonic control of the Straits of Malacca so it can strangle China's oceanic transport (commodities in, products out).

The Chinese want to build a canal through Thailand to end the Straits as a choke-point. So the government there is overthrown by chaos and the military.

Malaysia has very entwined Free Trade Zone relationships with China.

Everywhere China invests, the U.S. creates chaos.
Libya, Greece, South Sudan, Ukraine, Thailand, Iraq, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Vietnam, Mongolia are just a few.

I follow China very closely for the last dozen years and this pattern is predictable. The U.S. turns peace into war, investment into loses, stability into chaos. Most of these are maritime or petroleum points in the Chinese trade system. They have lost hundreds of billions in recent years because of these situations.

The Chinese need Russia, Russia needs China. And they need to gather more big nations. BRICS and SCO are just the beginning of what they need.

The U.S. is going to toss Turkey some heavy trouble soon. Probably, will use the Kurds and ISIS.
Turkey is talking to Russia. It is inevitable that Turkey will get a storm the government cannot handle.

The U.S. is working over South Korea for its very close relationship with China. Forcing a missile defense system which is a threat to both China and Russia. Notice, last week the DPRK offered the idea of a Federal re-uniting of North and South. What was the response? I've heard nothing. Didn't the world want this? Isn't that what the last 60 years has been all about? Well, the U.S. does not want a resolution. It wants trouble, so its power is necessary in the East China Sea region.

Malaysia is an easy patsie for U.S. power. It isn't radical muslim, isn't aggressive by nature, a place you can build filthy rare earth processing plants and they won't say anything about the pollution.

I imagine the Chief of Station of the CIA can tell the Prime Minister and head of Malaysia Air that we are going to disappear a plane or two, kill some 600 people and string the world along with lies, and the leadership will say nothing. Patsies. Overwhelmed. They'd give the COS their wives and daughters, or sons for a night or two, if that was the "request".

So a few lying headlines is no big thing in KL.
26 July, 2014 13:40

and then from Wikispooks

Wikispooks said...The more I ponder MH17 and the whole Ukrainian imbroglio, the more obvious (to me) it becomes that deeply-laid plans and minutely detailed gaming of every conceivable scenario are behind all that has happened since the prematurely sprung February coup in Kiev. That emphatically includes the MH17 shoot-down, together with the fact that is was another Malaysian plane being no accident. The foot-soldiers were the Ukie military; the planning and execution control were pure CIA.

No matter what my heart tells me, the fact is that the Russian elite are deeply divided in a number of ways, interven/don't intervene being only the most obvious. Larchmonter445 is spot on in his 13:40 post. Thus the big problem, for Russia-China and the whole BRICS endeavour, is that Russian elite divisions are both an obvious and very serious weakness. The Anglo-US-NATO power brokers can see this clear-as-a-bell and, per the above, have thoroughly gamed it.

Their bet is that they can keep the European ZOG's of Europe - especially Germany and France - on board even without an overt military intervention from Russia and the relentless continuing western MSM demonising propaganda is harnessed to just that purpose. If it appears to be failing, then another false-flag is no-doubt already primed and ready to go. If Russia does embark on overt military intervention, then perhaps it will be shelved. Either way the Anglo-US-NATO agenda will remain pretty much on track.

All things considered, this really does look increasingly like 'the big one' to me. The Empire is not going to back down short of open war - and considering its profiability and system reset potential etc etc, probably not then either. The deeply worrying question for me is: Will Russia's internal divisions prevent it from dealing optimally with those increasingly obvious facts.
26 July, 2014 16:26

Having lived through the Cold War, most confrontations and wars took place far away from Russian borders. This Ukraine situation has a feel unlike anything I can remember.