FBI Evidence Proves Oswald's Ammunition was not Capable of Sufficient Accuracy to Kill JFK

[Drew Phipps]

Re: my previous post about Walt Cakebread:

There may be more than one. Apparently there is some JFK researcher using that moniker now. The Walt Cakebread I speak of is the one mentioned here:

Jack White was the author that did an article about Cakebread's observations in 1995. Thse are his notes from a (COPA?) speech. (excerpted from http://www.baylor.edu/lib/poage/white/do...196920.pdf)

"Based on information furnished by California researcher Walt Cakebread I wrote an article for the July 1995 Fourth Decade on Walt's discovery that the government had photographed two different Mannlicher-Carcano bullets ... yet claimed that both photos depicted the same evidence. This c[size=12][size=12]laim is demonstrably false. Sombody went to a lot of trouble to create a near-duplicate of CE399 and substitute it as the official evidence. Except, there [size=12]is a very subtle difference in the two which nobody except Walt noticed.
[/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE]

[size=12][size=12][size=12]

[size=12]The original CE399 was fired from a rifle

[/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE]

[size=12][size=12][size=12]
[/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE]

[size=12][size=12][size=12]
[/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][size=12][size=12][size=12][size=12]having 6-lands-and-6-grooves. But the official CE399 now in evidence has only 4-lands-and-4-grooves. Why is that significant? Because the Mannlicher-Carcano rifle in evidence, CE 139, has only 4 lands and grooves. It is impossible for it to fire a bullet with 6 lands and grooves!"[/SIZE]
[/SIZE]
[/SIZE][/SIZE]