06-11-2014, 12:27 PM
What if the MIC approach was double-barrelled? In other words, a perpetual war state guarantees defence spending, but at the same time artificially floats the price of oil by keeping military tensions simmering, causing "uncertainty" in the market?
This would mean that it's still "War For Oil", but not the way that we thought.
This would mean that it's still "War For Oil", but not the way that we thought.