11-08-2009, 03:42 PM
Peter, et al,
The fatal mistake made by those who would engage this "Colby" entity -- hereinafter The Channel, insofar as the cover identity channels the words of, in my studied estimation, at least three dedicated intelligence assets/officers -- occurs when they speak to "him" instead of about "him."
This being noted, the other forum is a rigged game. When one attempts to speak substantively about The Channel by providing proof of "his" sinister components and functions, moderators and administrators there will have none of it.
The selective nature of this policy of the other forum is revealed often. Just today, its "good cop" owner has referred to John McAdam as a "disinformation agent." Which McAdam surely is.
The owner has done so because he "believes" his characterization of McAdam to be accurate (stated), and because he acknowledges that it is our duty to expose the enemy whenever and wherever possible (implied).
Yet by the very rules the owner has established and continues to enforce blindly, he would have been prohibited from doing his duty if McAdam had been a member of the other forum.
Peter, we've outed "Colby" here on the DPF, and we'll continue to find, out, and otherwise expose "his" ilk.
But understand this single inescapable fact: The worst people on the planet get a "W" every time one of the good guys engages one of their channels.
To engage is to dignify.
To expose is to destroy.
Charlie
The fatal mistake made by those who would engage this "Colby" entity -- hereinafter The Channel, insofar as the cover identity channels the words of, in my studied estimation, at least three dedicated intelligence assets/officers -- occurs when they speak to "him" instead of about "him."
This being noted, the other forum is a rigged game. When one attempts to speak substantively about The Channel by providing proof of "his" sinister components and functions, moderators and administrators there will have none of it.
The selective nature of this policy of the other forum is revealed often. Just today, its "good cop" owner has referred to John McAdam as a "disinformation agent." Which McAdam surely is.
The owner has done so because he "believes" his characterization of McAdam to be accurate (stated), and because he acknowledges that it is our duty to expose the enemy whenever and wherever possible (implied).
Yet by the very rules the owner has established and continues to enforce blindly, he would have been prohibited from doing his duty if McAdam had been a member of the other forum.
Peter, we've outed "Colby" here on the DPF, and we'll continue to find, out, and otherwise expose "his" ilk.
But understand this single inescapable fact: The worst people on the planet get a "W" every time one of the good guys engages one of their channels.
To engage is to dignify.
To expose is to destroy.
Charlie
Charles Drago
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene