The unmentionable - the 'other' Forum

[Peter Lemkin]

Peter, et al,

The fatal mistake made by those who would engage this "Colby" entity -- hereinafter The Channel, insofar as the cover identity channels the words of, in my studied estimation, at least three dedicated intelligence assets/officers -- occurs when they speak to "him" instead of about "him."

This being noted, the other forum is a rigged game. When one attempts to speak substantively about The Channel by providing proof of "his" sinister components and functions, moderators and administrators there will have none of it.

The selective nature of this policy of the other forum is revealed often. Just today, its "good cop" owner has referred to John McAdam as a "disinformation agent." Which McAdam surely is.

The owner has done so because he "believes" his characterization of McAdam to be accurate (stated), and because he acknowledges that it is our duty to expose the enemy whenever and wherever possible (implied).

Yet by the very rules the owner has established and continues to enforce blindly, he would have been prohibited from doing his duty if McAdam had been a member of the other forum.

Peter, we've outed "Colby" here on the DPF, and we'll continue to find, out, and otherwise expose "his" ilk.

But understand this single inescapable fact: The worst people on the planet get a "W" every time one of the good guys engages one of their channels.

To engage is to dignify.

To expose is to destroy.

Charlie

I agree there is a logical (sic) problem where disinformation agents can be identified off the other forum, but the rules, as written, don't allow identification of one ON the forum. This is mostly what the 'intent of a poster' thread there is about and the reason Jack's post was made invisible today - and most of you got into hot water with the PTB there. I'd like to see that change. I may be possible. It may not be. Certain persons there, even if not disinfo agents are just such blockers of a thread moving forward [trolls] that that alone one would think would be enough - and has been in the past for a few....we will see.....or I'll eventually give-up, as it is not the same place it was a few years ago....