19-12-2014, 08:35 AM
This morning CBS news aired an interview with former notorious computer hacker Hector Monsegur about the cyberattack on Sony's computers and email systems.
See: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/sony-hack-fo...sponsible/ (http://www.cbsnews.com/news/sony-hack-fo...sponsible/) .
This interview left me with a number of questions on my mind.
Mr. Monsegur stated that North Korea simply could not have conducted the cyberattack because of the insufficiency of its Internet infrastructure.
He also stated that no one could exfiltrate a terabyte of data over a short period of time. He said that it would take weeks, if not months, to do, and it probably could not happen undetected.
If North Korea doesn't have the capability to do such a thing, and do it undetected, then who could? The United States government, that's who!
Mr. Monsegur speculates that it was a Sony insider who perpetrated the hack on Sony's computers and who then sold the data to someone who presumably passed it on to the media.
If this were, in fact, the case, don't you think that the F.B.I. could have tracked things down back to the original perpetrators by now? Of course, if our own government was the perp, then the F.B.I. would let things slide.
The next question on my mind is: why would the main stream media disseminate the contents of Sony's email? If it were known that the source was from an alleged hacking incident, then the media would be crazy to trust the admitted dishonest source, but they went with publicizing it all instead. One more thing: Sony is a media company. You'd think that other media companies would be in solidarity with a fellow media company and would respect Sony's privacy as they would be concerned about their own... BUT THE MASS MEDIA HAD NO SUCH RESPECT FOR A FELLOW MEDIA COMPANY!!
Who controls... who pulls the strings of the main stream media? Why, the main stream media is known to be government controlled media. If the government wants one media company to stomp on another media company, then this is exactly what will happen.
The government, per last report, wants to pin the blame for the cyberattack and its subsequent terror threats against theaters on the North Koreans who have issued a denal. If North Korea was behind the terror threat on theaters, then why in the world would they negate the force of that threat by denying things?
This whole episode smacks of a false flag attack.
Be on guard for the next shoe to drop meaning the next false flag attack to be attributed to North Korea and the next fraudulent war.
See: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/sony-hack-fo...sponsible/ (http://www.cbsnews.com/news/sony-hack-fo...sponsible/) .
This interview left me with a number of questions on my mind.
Mr. Monsegur stated that North Korea simply could not have conducted the cyberattack because of the insufficiency of its Internet infrastructure.
He also stated that no one could exfiltrate a terabyte of data over a short period of time. He said that it would take weeks, if not months, to do, and it probably could not happen undetected.
If North Korea doesn't have the capability to do such a thing, and do it undetected, then who could? The United States government, that's who!
Mr. Monsegur speculates that it was a Sony insider who perpetrated the hack on Sony's computers and who then sold the data to someone who presumably passed it on to the media.
If this were, in fact, the case, don't you think that the F.B.I. could have tracked things down back to the original perpetrators by now? Of course, if our own government was the perp, then the F.B.I. would let things slide.
The next question on my mind is: why would the main stream media disseminate the contents of Sony's email? If it were known that the source was from an alleged hacking incident, then the media would be crazy to trust the admitted dishonest source, but they went with publicizing it all instead. One more thing: Sony is a media company. You'd think that other media companies would be in solidarity with a fellow media company and would respect Sony's privacy as they would be concerned about their own... BUT THE MASS MEDIA HAD NO SUCH RESPECT FOR A FELLOW MEDIA COMPANY!!
Who controls... who pulls the strings of the main stream media? Why, the main stream media is known to be government controlled media. If the government wants one media company to stomp on another media company, then this is exactly what will happen.
The government, per last report, wants to pin the blame for the cyberattack and its subsequent terror threats against theaters on the North Koreans who have issued a denal. If North Korea was behind the terror threat on theaters, then why in the world would they negate the force of that threat by denying things?
This whole episode smacks of a false flag attack.
Be on guard for the next shoe to drop meaning the next false flag attack to be attributed to North Korea and the next fraudulent war.
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass